Subject	Subtle differences are in the rear half of the exhaust.
Posted by	jschrauwen on August 25, 2008 at 3:03 PM
	This message has been viewed 86 times.
In Reply To	2+2 vs coupe exhaust. posted by AntiHero on August 25, 2008 at 02:33 PM
Message	Due in part to the location of the 2+2 gas tank, the routing of the pipes leading to the mufflers have fairly sharp angles to them. The 2+0 has less of a sharp bend to their muffler pipes. This applies to the aftermarket catback systems. Your idea of simple trimming to a 2+2 catback to fit a 2+0 will not be simple at all. 1990 JDM RHD - Stage X 491.0 RWHP, 476.1 RWTQ, 18 PSI, Pump gas 26PSI w/Race gas = ???
Follow Ups	2+2 vs coupe exhaust. - AntiHero 14:33:42 08/25/08 As per Greg Dupree... - John B. (NJ) 14:47:32 08/25/08 thanks.. - AntiHero 14:55:27 08/25/08 Seems that way... - John B. (NJ) 15:00:11 08/25/08 thats what I thought - AntiHero 15:05:34 08/25/08 How much do you want for the B&B? Send me an e-mail. (n/m) - WoodmanZ 16:40:26 08/25/08 2nd - gt300zxtt 21:38:51 08/25/08 You gather incorrectly. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 16:24:30 08/25/08 You cant mix and match components form either system - Tony@GZ 14:51:02 08/25/08 Subtle differences are in the rear half of the exhaust. - jschrauwen 15:03:09 08/25/08 Listen to this fellow, he is the authority on this subject. - WoodmanZ 17:34:04 08/25/08 Too funny :) (n/m) - jschrauwen 22:40:32 08/25/08 Different. No. No. Way off. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 15:33:56 08/25/08 wont fit and it wont be worth it to modify - G'SIIIZ 17:49:01 08/25/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.